Thom Hogan

Late last month I wrote "I originally had an additional question in this list to answer…” Today I can reveal both the question and the answer. The question was “when will Nikon introduce a new DX camera?” The answer is today. (In my original answer I would have had a prediction date of any time in November or even December, as the EU’s USB-C charging deadline kicks in after Christmas, and the original Z50 should no longer be headed to Europe after that.)

Right up front we need to address an elephant that's now entered the room. By updating a DX model, Nikon is essentially showing a commitment to continuing Z DX. The original Z50 model Is now five years old (plus a couple of weeks), so updating the first DX model suggests that the crop sensor cameras will be around for a fair time longer. That's particularly true given that Nikon is bringing the big Z9 generation improvements to DX now.

So what exactly is a Z50 II? 

Basically, a redesigned Z50. While you’ll see clear similarities between the II model and the original, the new body is indeed new: the Z50 II doesn’t have the EVF jutting out the back as much, while the front hand grip has been made a bit more hand friendly. Some buttons and controls have moved. The Rear LCD was changed. Overall, the size of the new model is similar, but more bag friendly due to that limited EVF overhang. Weight has increased substantively to 550g with card and battery (up from 450g), so the Z50 II feels "denser" than the original. And while size is up a bit in the CIPA-standardized measurements, most of you aren't going to notice the small size change. 

Yes, I know you’re all screaming “but what about the image sensor and focus?” Patience grasshoppers. 

The Z50 II uses the same 20.9mp sensor that Nikon has been using in Z DX since the beginning. To my knowledge, there are no tweaks or changes to its fundamentals—and yes, I asked Nikon and got responses to this question—which I consider fine, since the Nikon 20.9mp sensor has been one of the better APS-C sensors since it first appeared (and then later updated). One early document Nikon shared with me says “reduced noise,” but I believe that comes about due to better JPEG processing. Some will complain “but where are all the pixels?”, however getting back to that elephant I’m pretty sure that Nikon is thinking that if you want more pixels, you should go FX (the Z5 is currently about the same price as the Z50 II). Yes, Nikon was first to 45mp in their (FX) offerings, but they're also showing they're likely going to be one of the last to abandon the 20/24mp base models.

The sensor is not stabilized, so you’ll want to use one of Nikon’s VR lenses with the camera if you need stabilization. Remember, lens VR is two axis, not five, which tends to drop the overall stabilization ability slightly. Not all of the Nikkor DX lenses have CIPA numbers in their technical specifications for VR, but the 18-140mm f/3.5-6.3 VR DX, for instance, is rated at 5 stops at maximum focal length, while the 12-28mm v/3.5-5.6 PZ VR DX is 4.5 stops. This is not quite as good as what you can get from the FX bodies and lenses, but still should prove quite useful.

As expected, EXPEED7 takes over the processing duties, which brings with it all (okay, most) of the Z9 goodness. That includes the Z9 Subject Detection autofocus system, including the dedicated Bird mode, customizable Large-area, as well as 3D-tracking. One new addition to the focus system is a Product review mode. This is where if you suddenly hold something in front of you, the camera will focus on that, then revert to whatever subject detection you were using when you take that object away. If you're wondering what the minimum low light capability of the focus is, Nikon is claiming -9EV (with an f/1.2 lens at base ISO), which is considerably better than the original Z50. 

HEIF now makes its debut in DX, as do Portrait impression balance and Skin Softening. We get C15 (15 fps) and C30 (30 fps) release modes, supporting pre-release capture. Maximum mechanical shutter speed stays at 11 fps (also 1 to 5 and 5.6 fps are available). Nikon Imaging Cloud comes along for the ride (I’ll talk about the related aspect of that more in a moment). A number of subtle things, like changing the rear LCD display information orientation when you hold the camera vertically, also come along from the Z9. Meanwhile, the LCD itself is now a 3.2” articulating display, much like the Z30’s. 

The EVF is still 2.36m dot, but is now twice as bright. The Z50 maxed out at 500 nits; the Z50 II can be set as high as 1000 nits. Another internal change is UHS II support for the SD storage card (which is necessary for some of the video changes; see next paragraph). Also, the battery is now the EN-EL25a, which has a higher capacity than the older EN-EL25 the Z50 used. CIPA numbers for the battery are down slightly, but remember, this is a camera with an internal flash, and CIPA tests require flash for each image. I judge the new camera to be about 10% more battery hungry, but again, EXPEED7 is at the controls, and it is running more and faster processes.

Video gets a host of improvements, including UHD 4K/60P (though with a 1.5x crop). UHD 4K/30P video is oversampled from 5.6K, which should result in excellent, detailed recordings. The Z50 II is the first DX camera to get N-Log, 10-bit H.265, and Hi-res zoom. N-Log supports the RED LUTs as well as the standard Nikon LUT. There’s a tally lamp on the camera for video, electronic VR has been improved, the camera has waveform monitoring, and the Z50 II now sports a headphone monitoring jack. That headphone jack also supports a new optional (US$37) MC-DC3 wired remote control that plugs into it (the wireless ML-L7 is also supported). Maximum video recording time works out to be about 125 minutes, and I believe that's file size constrained (battery would wear out earlier). 

Another interesting change is that the Z50 II doesn’t require Nikon Webcam Utility to stream. The camera directly supports both UVC and UAC streaming via its USB-C port, and applications such as Zoom or Microsoft Teams should immediately detect the camera. My Yololiv switcher supports the Z50 II via USB-C, which means I now have a five-camera switcher.

Next up is what Nikon is touting as the “hero feature” of the Z50 II: a dedicated Picture Control button (on the top right plate; see above) that gives you quick access to not only all the usual 31 Picture Controls (including the most recent three Nikon has introduced), but Image Recipes direct from Nikon Imaging Cloud, as well as any Flexible Picture Controls you've created. Definitely a “creator” feature, and I’ll have more to say about this in my talks at the end of the month. 

Most of the Z50 features remain, including the built-in flash and the Fn1/Fn2 buttons out front. Everyone will be happy that the virtual buttons (DISP and the two zoom buttons) have become real buttons, though this resulted in some button position shuffling. Frankly, the AE-L/AF-L button, which I use for AF-ON, seems to be better positioned now.

Now for the price: US$910 body only, US$1050 with the 16-50mm kit lens, and US$1299 in the two-lens kit. The specific release-to-customer date is still up in the air as I write this, but is expected in late November. Nikon should be supplying me with an early production camera shortly, so I’ll have a lot more to say about it on my Black Friday date in LA as I start using the release version of the firmware.

That’s the body, so now let’s buzz, buzz a bit (my shorthand for being annoying about “where are the lenses?”). 

I have good news and bad. The good news is that there are now 33 DX autofocus lenses available for the Z30/Z50/Z50II/Zfc quadruplets (plus, of course, all the FX lenses). From 16mm (24mm equivalent) to 75mm (~105mm equivalent), we have quite a few DX prime lens options, with fast aperture options available from multiple vendors at 16mm, 23/24mm, 32/33/35mm, and 50/56mm. So the traditional 24mm to 85mm (effective) prime range is really well covered, and a number of those lenses are quite remarkable optically, too. More autofocus primes from third parties show up every week (another will be announced shortly). (To see which third party autofocus lenses are available, check this site's lens database.)

Another bit of good news is that the FX side of the Z mount is now really well built out from 24mm upward (that's 35mm real focal length, or 36mm DX equivalent) to way longer than you’re going to mount on a Z50 II. Nikon’s 28-400mm f/4-8 VR coupled with the DX 12-28mm f/3.5-5.6 PZ VR DX would give you a two-lens set that goes from 18mm to 600mm (equivalent), both with stabilization. Tamron’s recent 50-400mm f/4.5-6.3 also has image stabilization and looks like a reasonable walk-around birder lens for a Z50 II user.

The bad news comes if you want a DX zoom lens. Or a Nikkor DX lens. Only four of the former and five of the latter exist. The next bad news: a fast mid-range zoom (e.g. 24-70mm equivalent f/2.8) doesn’t yet exist. The Z50 II really needs a compact 16-55mm f/2.8 DX VR and/or 16-80mm f/4 DX VR. And the final bad news: without sensor VR on the Z50 II, it’s really only the DX zooms, some FX zooms, and the long FX telephoto lenses that are going to stabilize your images. 

It’s difficult for me to feel too buzzy about where we are with Nikon DX in the mirrorless mount, though. If we had a broader and deeper DX body choice I’d probably be complaining. But most of you are going to find a two- or three-lens kit that works for the level of camera the Z50 II is. The only truly missing option at the moment is a fast mid-range zoom that's appropriately sized.

In summary, Nikon did what we expected them to: they've brought the Z50 into the Z9 world. If the Z8 was a mini Z9 and the Z6 III was a quasi Z8, then the Z50 II is a miniature Z6 III. There's a lot of horsepower and features packed in a small, easy-to-carry body that comes in at less than one large (or ten Benjamins). 

Obviously, now that the camera has been announced and I'm able to write about it, I'll have much more to say about it in the not too distant future. And don't forget my LA Day on Black Friday, where Mark Comon and I will, amongst all the other events we've put together for that special day, host a Zoom presentation to provide a fuller evaluation of the Z50 II to online viewers (click here to see the events and how to sign up).

Bonus: I've found a few other subtle touches in the updated camera. NEF files, like all the Z9 generation, are now always 14-bit, and yes, we get the High efficiency variants to keep file size small. Slow shutter speeds can be set down to 900 seconds. Surprisingly, Nikon added the voice memo option. And yes, we do get the NETWORK menu for the connectivity stuff, so that means that RETOUCH is now an i-button function on playback. Also, the Z50 II has manual focus subject detection. Customization pretty much includes everything other than Recall shooting function. 

With annoying regularity I get and/or see forum posts denigrating SnapBridge. As someone who encouraged Nikon to include the camera-to-smartphone connection in the first place, it always makes me grind my teeth a bit every time I get or see another of these posts.

Let’s start up front: Nikon has caused a number of the issues themselves. In an un-useful attempt to save power—Bluetooth is very low power to start with—Nikon has set the rate at which the cameras ping their willingness to connect way too high (several seconds). Much of setup delays seem to relate to this decision, as it takes a frustratingly long time before the mobile device and camera agree that they’re communicating. 

Even though it’s an iOS issue, SnapBridge takes you to the wrong page in Settings in order to “forget” a previous connection when you later try to set up again (on an iOS device go to Settings > Bluetooth > [scroll to previously connected device] > i > Forget This Device).

Those two things by themselves tend to generate most of the SnapBridge complaints. There are others, but the fact that neither has been addressed by Nikon is the root of the real SnapBridge Problem: Nikon is allowing users to post their frustration and annoyance with the product, when the actual problem could be addressed by Nikon. This has continued to be true since 2016 when SnapBridge first appeared. So that's eight years of not addressing issues that Nikon could control. When a company does that—go into ignore mode—they deserve the flack that they’ll continue to get every time they try to promote the option.

Android, of course, raises other issues, which doesn’t help. But let me just say it: most of the SnapBridge Problem appears to be Nikon, or at least in Nikon’s control.

I’m not seeing the Chinese have this same issue. Acsoon, DJI, Insta360, and a host of other SE Asian companies that are using mobile to device communications all connect quicker, more reliably, and provide more robust help for the few times they don’t. 

But there’s a bigger problem looming for SnapBridge now. 

It started with NX Mobile Air. Once that new app was able to do camera-to-mobile-device via the airwaves, we got competing pathways with differing UI and abilities (and since I’m in complaining mode: US$4.49 a month in order to create more than one album in the memory of your mobile device is ridiculous; moreover, deleting pictures already on your device if your subscription expires is beyond ridiculous). 

But now we also have Nikon Imaging Cloud (at least on the Z6 III). So we have a third way to interact with our mobile device which does yet another set of functions through the air. Gee, what’s next, NX Mobile Tether? 

This reeks of both the inability to understand where a camera fits into the 21st century—just swat flies with a new app when a new user need is noticed—as well as an inability to give a 21st century user the way they want to interact with their mobile device in the first place (hint: it isn’t with a dozen apps to connect two devices). This reminds me of the old debate between science and religion about whether the solar system revolves around the Earth (camera) or the sun (mobile device). The answer is obvious to those that observe, so my conclusion is that nobody in Tokyo has poked their heads out of their offices to see what’s actually going on. Cameras revolve around the mobile device, not vice versa.

Nikon’s president recently said "“We are now in an age where smartphones and digital cameras can coexist.” [source: yomiuri.co.jp] Gee, didn’t I write that in 2007 (and pretty much ever since)? This is new to Nikon? 

My worry is that Nikon feels that they’re embracing smartphones by just creating a bunch of conduits (apps) that do limited things. To make matters worse, they're not investing enough to do it right. 

We really only need two apps (and many would argue that they could be combined):

1. Phone controls the camera. 
2. Camera feeds the phone. 

It’s time for Nikon to stop creating new apps and make the correct one that I told them back in 2011 that they needed. 

I know I’ll get some blowback on my next comment: if doing it right requires a subscription fee, so be it. However, any subscription fee needs to be reasonable, and has to be for real R&D and improvement, not just to unlock storage we already paid for on our phone. 

Nikon’s expertise started and grew in hardware engineering. Thing is, by now they should have realized that the software side is what is now unlocking physical hardware to do things that would be beyond just typical hardware improvement. That’s true of steppers (Nikon Precision), it’s true of cameras (Nikon Imaging), and it’s true in every one of Nikon’s other businesses, as well. 

We no longer need a bridge, we need a direct connection. 

Nikon today issued a press release officially describing its intention to produce a 28-135mm f/4 PZ lens. The PZ stands for power zoom.

Nikon has done power zoom lenses before, including for Z DX. And the MN-10 Remote Grip has the ability to remotely trigger zoom. However, you might have noted my use of quotes in the headline. 

Nikon’s view of the “video market” is a bit different than a dedicated videographer probably thinks. You’ll note the lack of some significant mechanical gearing in Nikon’s supplied image. In the video world, geared focus, zoom, and aperture rings are common, and for good reason: doing managed “pulls” can be precise. 

Moving the zoom to a lever or remote lever is more of a broadcast type design, where you go for minimal external rigging to stay nimble. The PZ design would appeal more to the camcorder crowd than the dedicated videographer. 

Thus, all those stories you see today on other sites linking this lens to part of Nikon’s purchase of RED seem a bit of a stretch to me. The RED cameras are not really designed as run-and-gun cameras, where you’d want power zoom. I see the 28-135mm f/4 PZ as more a step towards video as opposed to an immersion in it. Moreover, since Sony has had 28-135mm f/4 since 2014, the impetus for launching a Nikon version probably is more due to that than RED. I should also note that the Sony version has geared rings and image stabilization.

No real details were made available about Nikon’s version, though from the photo we would say “removable, rotatable tripod mount, multiple LFn buttons, and probably no lens VR.” The gold mount ring and lettering seems to imply a new series of lenses.

As to why a development announcement today, I take this to mean that Nikon has some of these lenses in the field at the moment for late testing. In the past, Nikon development announcements have tended to come when prototypes are circulating in pro hands where someone might be able to spot them (though in a couple of cases they were clearly FUD [fear uncertainty doubt] marketing initiated). 

One thing I didn't mention in the previous Nikkor Nuggets article is the "congestion" in certain focal lengths. Okay, some would say alternative choices, but this notion is something worth paying attention to.

Of the (now) 96 autofocus lenses available for the Z-mount, here's the telling statistic:

• goes below <24mm in focal length — 7 FX, 3 DX  10 total
• stays within 24-200mm in focal length — 45 FX, 17 DX  62 total
• goes higher than >200mm in focal length — 11 FX, 2 DX  13 total

You're pretty much covered in the mid-range, as you have what's quickly becoming an overwhelming set of choices to achieve some focal lengths (24, 35, 50, 85, 200; see chart below). 

While many think we have plenty of telephoto options now, that really boils down to two makers providing >200mm: Nikon and Tamron. It's difficult to imagine Nikon doing a lot more in this realm, though the two pro F-mount zooms (120-300mm f/2.8 and 180-400mm f/4 TC) are conspicuously missing, as are the two F-mount PF lenses (300mm f/4 and 500mm f/5.6). If Nikon and Tamron both round out their telephoto offerings as much as we can expect, we might get to 20 choices above 200mm, which should be more than enough. Should Sigma ever decide to come and play in the FX mount, we could go above 20 choices. 

It's the wider-than-24mm end that I think needs attention. Nikon themselves only gets to 14mm, with two zooms. There's a higher burst of activity beginning at the 24mm mark, but below 20mm we're talking about only two third party FX primes and one DX prime. Yes, one could argue that we should throw in the manual focus lenses into the extreme wide angle end judgment, as you often either aren't focusing on moving targets or are relying upon depth of field when you're framed that wide. Still, it seems to me that wide angle is the current Z-mount hole: more useful autofocus lenses that go below 24mm, particularly primes, are needed. 

For me, for instance, I want a small very wide angle prime to go with my safari kit when I want to go Galen-esque; the zooms start getting a bit on the big and slow side for that, as my packing is getting tighter and tighter with weight and size limits imposed by airlines and small plane hops to dirt airstrips.

Just for the heck of it, I also made a graphic look at the autofocus lens choices. Basically, if you needed a lens at a number of common focal lengths, how many choices would you have? Well, this:

Granted, the zoom lenses distort the situation a bit, as we have such things now as a 24-200mm, 28-400mm, and even 50-400mm. I'm not sure any of those lenses are the ones you'd pick if you needed 85mm (the second highest peak in the graph). However, the graph does confirm that for FX there's now a reasonable amount of choice in that 24mm to 200mm range, as noted above. 

For quite some time my general advice to those on the Upgrade Train has been to skip generations. That's tricky with the Z System, as the only camera for which that really applies right now is the Z6! 

Nikon's missing updates (Z50 II, Z5 II, Z7 III) are starting to cause some concern, as we now have cameras that are five, four, and four years old respectively. In addition, exactly where the eventual Z8 and Z9 updates land, as well as what Nikon will do in the future with the dials cameras (Zf, Zfc), is adding additional questioning by those that bought into the Z lineup. 

The past four years have been one or two new model years:

• 2021 — Zfc, Z9
• 2022 — Z30
• 2023 — Z8, Zf
• 2024 — Z6 III

Five of those were "new" models, and only one was an update. It seems to me that this needs to flip, right? Nikon needs to find compelling reasons for an existing Z user to move up (e.g. Z30 or Z50 user to Z70 or FX) or to upgrade (e.g. Zfc, Zf, Z5, Z7 II, Z8, or Z9 to what?). 2025 seems to be the year we will get our first real hints at what the strategy really is (or if there is even a strategy). 

Meanwhile, our lens road map was lost at the last GAS stop, and there's no Google Map to replace it. We'll soon reach the "50 lens" mark that Nikon executives talked about, so what happens after that? And why is 2024 so quiet for lenses (and also, why all at a more consumer level)? 

• 2018 — 3 lenses
• 2019 — 7 lenses
• 2020 — 6 lenses
• 2021 — 9 lenses
• 2022 — 5 lenses
• 2023 — 8 lenses
• 2024 — 3 lenses

At the moment at least, it seems to me that Nikon's 2024 holiday strategy is not at all an "upgrade" strategy. Unless, of course, you're still a DSLR user. The problem with that, of course, is that Nikon will be trying to close out sales of the DSLRs during this season, so they'll be competing with themselves in a way that isn't long-term productive. 

I usually try to give some buying advice going into the big holiday shopping season, but right now it appears that this just boils down to:

• DSLR users should consider moving to the Z System. But if you haven't already, you're going to be hard to convince.
• Z5 or Z6 owners should consider the Zf or Z6 III. And yet, for casual one-frame-at-a-time work, that might not be a particularly useful upgrade.
• Everyone else should just buy some lenses. DX users probably don't have any more to buy. FX users now have to pick from a lot of increasingly overlapping choices. Or you could get Chinese take out (obvious humor point deleted as being ethnically stereotyped).

Myself? I still need to pick up the two f/1.4 primes for testing, but Nikon is not really on my list to Santa this year. Your list may vary.

Funny thing is, I hear through the grapevine that Nikon is wondering why their sales seem to have gone down after the initial Z6 III rush. Well, simple: Nikon didn't address the viral "worse dynamic range" reports from the influencers, and other than the DSLR-to-Z and Z6 to Z6 III upgraders—some of which went with a Zf—Nikon hasn't given the others much to lust over. 

If that grapevine is correct, I expect some better discounting this holiday season from NikonUSA. It may be the only way they meet their sales expectations. 

Of course, there are two new Nikon cameras—we think they're cameras—registered with the governmental regulatory agencies pending. But we're getting close to the go/no go time limit for possible holiday launches (basically the last week of October). Dealers have already committed their cash to what they know they can get; they can't turn on a dime at the last minute. Moreover, given the rumors, what's currently pending in the Nikon launch queue is lower-end products, not the higher-end products that would help Nikon truly make their numbers for the quarter.

Nikon really needs to move a little further and a little faster than they have this year. 

Things just changed. Today Tamron introduced a new lens, and for the first time it's available immediately in the Sony FE and Nikon Z-mounts. Prior to this, we saw Tamron first introduce with the Sony FE mount, and then later offer some of those lenses in the Z-mount. If this simultaneous release stays true for future Tamron introductions, it says something about the current state of the mirrorless mounts. (Canon has not approved any full frame autofocus lenses for the RF mount yet, a policy that's still giving their users grief.)

The new lens is the rebirth of the famous 90mm f/2.8 Macro lens, with a number of redesign bits that make it better than its DSLR predecessor, both optically as well as in usage. In particular Tamron points to the better flat field performance as well as the 12-blade aperture diaphragm for the former, with new buttons, hood design, and focus ring torque for the latter.

The Tamron 90mm f/2.8 Macro now provides an alternative to the 105mm f/2.8 Micro-Nikkor, at a lower cost (US$699) and using Tamron's standardized 67mm filter sizing. This brings to six the number of Tamron lenses available in the Z-mount (nine if you count the Tamrikons), making Tamron easily the first of the traditional third party lens makers to "fully" support the Z-mount.

I just spent a fair amount of time trying to verify and add information about third party autofocus lenses for the Z-mount. The Third Party Autofocus Lenses section of the Web site has now been completely refreshed, including links to this site's exclusive advertiser, B&H, should you care to partake.

A few odd things I noted: a number of Chinese lenses are still only regionally available. Some that are available worldwide have differing prices than you'd find in, say, Hong Kong. Even B&H seems a little inconsistent with whether or not they have a vendor's full Z-mount lens line available and their pricing compared to in Asia.

Here's the thing: there are now 53 distinct autofocus lenses available from third-parties for the Nikon Z-mount. Moreover, I identified another dozen+ such lenses that have been teased or shown at recent trade shows, but don't seem to have been officially launched yet. 

Thus, we're rapidly approaching—or have passed the mark but it can't yet be verified—having 100 autofocus lenses available for the Z-mount. We'll likely be over 150 by the end of 2025. 

All this poses a bit of a problem for me. I currently have nine lens reviews in progress, five of which are third-party lenses. My hopes of having reviews of every autofocus lens for the Z-mount are fading rapidly, as I'm just one person fending off an onslaught from dozens of vendors now. So bear with me. I'm going to put a little bit of priority on catching up with Nikon, where I'm currently six lenses behind.